The simplest way to quantify the OES of binding energies is to use
the following three-point indicator:
By applying filter (1) to experimental nuclear binding energies, , one obtains the experimental neutron and proton OES, . Similarly, by applying this filter to calculated binding energies, one obtains information about theoretical results for the OES. In the following, the same subscripts are used to denote the binding energies and values of indicators (1) obtained for a given model. For example, for the single-particle model described below, the resulting values are and . Note that by using filter (1) we only aim at facilitating the comparison of calculations with data; however, in essence we always compare and analyze experimental and calculated binding energies.
As a simple exercise, let us first calculate the OES for
a system of particles moving independently in a fixed deformed
potential well. In such an extreme
single-particle model, the binding energy is
For the ground state of an even-N system the
N/2 lowest levels are filled. In the neighboring odd-Nsystem, the odd particle occupies the lowest available level.
This implies:
Consequently, at odd particle numbers N=2n+1,
we shall use the following filter,
It is clear that filters use masses of four nuclides near the given particle number N; i.e., they constitute asymmetric expressions in which either heavier or lighter nuclides dominate. On the other hand, uses masses of five nuclides symmetrically on both sides of N. The advantages of using either of these filters depend, therefore, predominantly on the availability of experimental data in the isotopic or isotonic chains. For instance, in Ref. [4] dealing with light- and medium-mass nuclei, the filter was discussed.
It is instructive to relate the asymmetric energy-spacing filters
of Eq. (8) to the particle
separation energies S(N)=B(N-1)-B(N), i.e.,
By using the three-mass filter (6), we hope to avoid mixing the contributions to the OES which originate from single-particle structure with those having other roots, e.g., pairing correlations. Moreover, because it involves three masses only, this filter allows obtaining experimental information on the longest isotopic or isotonic chains. Figures 1 and 2 display experimental values of the neutron and proton OES (6). (It is to be noted that these results slightly differ from those presented in Ref. [4]. Firstly, experimental masses were taken from an updated mass evaluation [23]. Secondly, only the masses having an experimental uncertainty less than 100keV have been considered.)
It is seen that, especially for the light- and medium-mass
nuclei, there exists a
substantial spread of results around the average trend.
This suggests that neutron and
proton OES effects are not only functions of neutron and proton
numbers, respectively, but that a significant cross-talk
between both types of nucleons exists.
Numerous studies of this isotopic dependence of the OES
exist [24,25,26],
usually based on higher-order filters such as the
four-point mass formula [21,22,24]:
Figure 3 (and solid lines in Figs. 1 and 2) present such average values, , for the neutron and proton OES. Neutron and proton values of the OES follow a similar pattern. Namely, they systematically decrease with A, and they are reduced around shell and subshell closures, as expected. It is also seen that neutron pairing gaps are systematically larger than the proton ones. The shift is mainly due to a mass dependence of the pairing strength and results from the fact that at a given value N, data are more available for lighter nuclei than at an identical value of Z. Indeed, for NZ, data exist mostly at A(N)<A(Z). A weak contribution from the Coulomb energy is also expected to contribute to this shift.