Next: Degenerate shell: Seniority model
Up: Limiting cases
Previous: Weak-pairing limit,
Strong-pairing limit,
In this case, the expansion parameter is
.
In the zero order, the wave function of an even system
with N=2n is the ground
state of
;
i.e., it corresponds to the state
with the maximal quasispin
=
and
the third component of quasispin
L0=(2n-
.
The binding energy is given by the seniority-model
expression (see Refs. [27,28] and Sec. 3.2),
![\begin{displaymath}
B_{\eta\gg1}^{(0)}(N=2n) =-G \left[ L_{\mbox{\rm\scriptsize {max}}}(L_{\mbox{\rm\scriptsize {max}}}+1) -
L_0(L_0-1) \right].
\end{displaymath}](img76.gif) |
(26) |
In the quasispin formalism, the single-particle Hamiltonian is a combination
of a scalar and a vector operator (with respect to the quasispin group),
and this implies the
=0,
1 selection rule for its matrix elements.
The expectation value of
in the lowest
L=
state is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f377b/f377bd0b2fbd112909e5abe48270ff51d20f2247" alt="\begin{displaymath}
B_{\eta\gg1}^{(1)}(N=2n)=\langle L_{\mbox{\rm\scriptsize {ma...
...}\vert
L_{\mbox{\rm\scriptsize {max}}}L_0\rangle
= 2n\bar{e},
\end{displaymath}" |
(27) |
where
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6628/f6628f8230b31de9ff27ffa3b39c23e722370557" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\bar{e} \equiv \frac{1}{\Omega}\sum_{k=1}^{\Omega} e_k
\end{displaymath}" |
(28) |
is the average single-particle energy.
The second-order correction to the energy is given by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6ac5/d6ac51b9aff7a5c81e0780aaf537ebdb392d7113" alt="\begin{displaymath}
B_{\eta\gg1}^{(2)}(N=2n)=-\sum_{L<L_{\mbox{\rm\scriptsize {m...
...\scriptsize {sp}}}\vert LL_0\alpha\rangle\vert^2}{E^*_{LL_0}}.
\end{displaymath}" |
(29) |
In Eq. (28)
denotes all the remaining quantum numbers other than
L and L0,
and
E*LL0 is the unperturbed excitation energy of
.
Since
can only connect the
seniority-zero
ground state with the seniority-two, L=
-1 states at
energy
,
Eq. (29) can be reduced to a simple form;
By introducing the variance of single-particle levels,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1aaf/e1aaf0c87525c924067c8aaecefc97048a33dbee" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\sigma^2_e \equiv \frac{1}{\Omega-1} \sum_{k=1}^{\Omega}(e_k-\bar{e})^2,
\end{displaymath}" |
(31) |
one can derive a simple expression for the second-order correction:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3de79/3de7912c6550698c35c1b10cb21f89d7eccb281a" alt="\begin{displaymath}
B_{\eta\gg1}^{(2)}(N=2n)=-\frac{1}{G\Omega^2}4n(\Omega-n)\sigma^2_e.
\end{displaymath}" |
(32) |
That is, the first- and second-order corrections to the binding energy are
given by the first and second moments of the single-particle energy
distribution.
Note that for the degenerate j-shell, the second-order
correction is zero, as expected.
For odd particle numbers, N=2n+1, one should take
Lmax=
-1)/2 and L0=(2n+1-
in Eq. (26). Assuming that the
odd particle occupies level n+1, this level is removed from the sum
of Eqs. (28) and (31),
i.e.,
one needs to consider the remaining
levels only:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c15e/1c15e36ba51d5890a56ca735275ed085be3f80a9" alt="\begin{displaymath}\bar{e}'\equiv \frac{1}{\Omega-1}\sum_{\raisebox{-1ex}{$\stac...
...$ }}^{\Omega} e_k
=\bar{e}+\frac{1}{\Omega-1}(\bar{e}-e_{n+1})
\end{displaymath}" |
(33) |
and
The resulting corrections to the binding energies can be written as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d07a/5d07a9e24b1f2b09bd9d551d0d79b59b79357f26" alt="\begin{displaymath}B_{\eta\gg1}^{(1)}(N=2n+1) = 2n\bar{e}'+e_{n+1}
\end{displaymath}" |
(35) |
and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3e34/c3e34191360566b63f59ac90a7cb3f89992f45ac" alt="\begin{displaymath}
B_{\eta\gg1}^{(2)}(N=2n+1)=-\frac{1}{G(\Omega-1)^2}4n(\Omega-n-1)
\sigma^{\prime 2}_e.
\end{displaymath}" |
(36) |
The zero-order expressions for
and
in the strong pairing limit are given in
Sec. 3.2.
By adding the zero- and first-order contributions to
the binding energy, one obtains
the strong-pairing-limit expressions for
:
It can easily be shown that the first-order correction to
vanishes.
Consequently, the seniority-model expressions discussed below give a good
approximation to
the single-particle energy-splitting filters (7)
and (8).
Next: Degenerate shell: Seniority model
Up: Limiting cases
Previous: Weak-pairing limit,
Jacek Dobaczewski
2000-03-09