In the present study, we solve the QRPA equations by using the iterative Arnoldi method, implemented in Ref. [22]. It provides us with an extremely efficient and fast way to solve the QRPA equations. The QRPA equations are well known [24,25] and have been recently reviewed in the context of the finite amplitude method [26]. Therefore, here we only give a brief resumé of basic equations, by presenting their particularly useful and compact form.
Basic dynamical variables of the QRPA method are given
by the generalized density matrix ,
![]() |
(4) |
![]() |
(5) |
The vibrational time-dependent HFB state
,
![]() ![]() ![]() |
(7) |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
(8) |
In this approach, states in Eq. (6) play a role of
Kohn-Sham-like wave functions, which serve the purpose of generating
generalized density matrices
only. Neither
represents a correct ground state of the system nor
represents that of an excited vibrational
state. However, the amplitude
, which constitutes the
fundamental degree of freedom of the QRPA method, does represent a
fair approximation to the transition density matrix between both
states of the system. It then allows for calculating matrix elements
of arbitrary one-body operators between the ground state and
vibrational state, which is the primary goal of the QRPA approach.
Equation (9) constitutes the base for our solution of the QRPA
equations in terms of the iterative Arnoldi method. Indeed, since the
mean-field amplitude
depends linearly on the density
amplitude
, Eq. (9) constitutes an
eigen-equation determining
and
.
However, the matrix to be diagonalized, that is the QRPA matrix, does
not have to be explicitly determined. To obtain the entire QRPA
strength function, it is enough to start from a pivot amplitude and
repeatedly act on it with the expression on the right-hand
side [22]. In each iteration, one only has to calculate the
mean-field amplitude
corresponding to the current
density amplitude
, which is an easy task. The pivot
can be freely chosen to optimally suit the calculation. It can for
example be random, a QRPA eigen-phonon or be constructed from an external
field. In this work we construct the pivot from the monopole
transition operator. This approach is fundamentally different than that used within the FAM of
Ref. [26], where an external field is used throughout the
calculation and Eq. (9) has to be iterated for all values of frequencies
.
Since both stationary (
) and time-dependent,
(
) density matrices are projective,
the QRPA amplitude
has vanishing matrix
elements between the quasihole and between the quasiparticle states, that is,
![]() |
(10) |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
(11) |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
(14) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(15) |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
(16) |
Finally, we can reduce the above QRPA formalism to spherical symmetry
used in the present study. Then, the vibrating amplitude of
Eq. (6) has good angular-momentum quantum numbers ,
that is,
and
hence all the QRPA amplitudes pertain to the given preselected
channel
, while the ground state
is spherical.
As a consequence, as dictated by the angular-momentum algebra,
only specific spherical single-particle states
are coupled by the QRPA amplitudes, which can be expressed
through the Wigner-Eckart theorem and reduced matrix elements as
Spurious QRPA mode appears in the QRPA calculations. In a
self-consistent full QRPA diagonalization, the spurious mode decouples
from the physical QRPA modes and appears at zero energy. In
the Arnoldi method, this separation does not happen unless we make the
full Arnoldi diagonalization, which usually is not feasible.
To prevent the mixing of physical QRPA excitations with the spurious
mode, before the Arnoldi iteration we create the spurious-mode
QRPA amplitudes and its associated conjugate-state (boost-mode) QRPA
amplitudes. The spurious
mode amplitudes follow from the
particle number operator and have the form,
Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization is used to keep during the Arnoldi
iteration the Krylov-space basis vectors orthogonal to the spurious
and boost modes, that is, each Krylov-space basis vector is orthogonalized
against
and
. The orthogonalization
procedure is described in detail in Ref. [22]. For the
semi-magic nuclei considered here, we only vary the particle number of
the nucleon species that has non-vanishing pairing correlations.