The remaining fields can be identified with the
mesons forming the pseudoscalar isovector multiplet
),
First of all we notice that Lagrangian density (38)
contains only one isovector multiplet of mesons - the
parity-inversed chiral partners have disappeared. This is good. The
mechanism of the chiral symmetry breaking explains this experimental
fact very well. In reality, the chiral partners still exist, but they
have been hidden in the field and pushed up to high
excitation energies. They can only be revealed by exciting an
(unknown) internal structure of the meson.
Second, Lagrangian density (38) contains no mass term (term
proportional to ), so the pions we have obtained are
massless. This is no accident, but a demonstration of a very general
fact that for dynamically broken symmetry there must exist a
massless boson. This fact is called the Goldstone theorem
Gol61, and the particle is called the Goldstone boson. It
sounds very sophisticated, but in fact it is a very simple
observation. Even in classical mechanics, if a particle is put into
the ``Mexican hat'' potential and treated within the small-vibration
approximation, one immediately obtains a zero-frequency mode that
corresponds to uniform motion around the hat. The Goldstone boson is
just that.
Third, we have derived the particular dependence of the pion-pion
Lagrangian (38) on the derivatives of the pion field. Every
such derivative must be combined with the particular denominator to
form the covariant derivative (39). This
guarantees the proper transformation properties of the pion field
with respect to the chiral group. When we later proceed with
constructing other Lagrangian densities of composite particles, we
shall use such a dependence on the pion fields.
Experimental masses of pions are not equal to zero, so the obtained
pion-pion Lagrangian density is too simplistic. However, we can now recall
that the quark mass terms do break the chiral symmetry explicitly (see Sec. 2.4). This corresponds to a slight
tilt of the ``Mexican hat'' to one side. (To which side, is
perfectly well defined by the O(4) structure of the quark mass terms
in Eq. (31) - but we shall not discuss that.) Such a tilt
creates a small curvature of the potential along the valley within the
hat's brim, and this curvature gives the pion-mass term
in the pion-pion Lagrangian density.
So the non-zero quark masses result in a non-zero pion mass. By the way,
the difference in masses of neutral and charged pions results from
a coupling to virtual photons - its origin is therefore in the QED,
and not in the QCD.
It is amazing how much can be deduced from considerations based on
the idea of the dynamical symmetry breaking. Considering the
complication of the problem, that is unavoidable on the quark-gluon
level, we have reached important results at a very low cost. This
happens again and again in almost every branch of physics of the
micro-world. Dynamical breaking of the local gauge symmetry gives
masses to the electroweak bosons and
, and leaves the
photon massless. Dynamical breaking of the rotational symmetry in
nuclei creates the collective moment of inertia and rotational bands.
Dynamical breaking of the particle-number symmetry gives
superconducting condensates in nuclei and in crystals. Dynamical
breaking of the parity symmetry in nuclei and molecules gives
collective partner bands of opposite parities. Dynamical breaking of
the chiral symmetry (in a different sense, pertaining to the
time-reversal symmetry) has been suggested to explain pairs of
nuclear rotational bands having the same parity. The story just does
not end. Dynamical symmetry breaking rules the world.