In order to discuss the conserved and broken symmetries in odd-fermion systems, we
now proceed to the discussion of the subgroups of the double group
D
.
In fact, the classification of Table 1 can now be
repeated almost without change. Indeed, whenever a given D
subgroup contains the time reversal
,
signature
,
or simplex
,
at least one of those, the corresponding subgroup of D
contains
,
,
or
,
and
it automatically becomes a doubled D
subgroup,
with exactly the same generators. This is so, because in the D
group the squares of the time reversal, signature, and simplex
operators are equal to
,
Eq. (5), and hence whenever
one of these operators is present in the subgroup, it generates the
appropriate double subgroup of the double group D
.
On the other
hand, when none of these generators are present in a given D
subgroup, this subgroup becomes the subgroup of D
without
doubling.
Therefore, all the D
subgroups listed in Table 1 are
simultaneously subgroups of D
,
provided the generators denoted with bold symbols are replaced by the
corresponding script generators.
Most of the D
subgroups have twice
more elements than the corresponding D
subgroups, with few
exceptions: subgroups
,
,
,
do not double, and contain the same number of
elements as the corresponding subgroups of D
.
Type | Generators | Generic | Total |
2-0A: |
![]() | 1 | 1 |
2-IA: |
![]() ![]() | 2 | 6 |
Total number of two-generator subgroups: | 3 | 7 | |
3-IA: |
![]() | 1 | 3 |
Total number of three-generator subgroups: | 1 | 3 | |
Total number of subgroups: | 4 | 10 |
In addition, these
few exceptional subgroups can be doubled explicitly by adding
to the set of generators. For completeness, these additional subgroups
of D
are enumerated in Table 2. However, the physical
contents of the additional, and of the corresponding not-doubled
subgroups from Table 1, are the same.
For example, they lead to exactly the
same symmetry properties of the density matrices[6]. The
difference between them consists in the fact that the latter ones
have no irreps in the spinor space, whereas the former ones have
one-dimensional irreps with spinor bases (cf.[15]).
However, from the view-point of the symmetry breaking, they lead to
exactly the same schemes, and thus the additional subgroups shown in
Table 2 can be called trivial. Note, that the single-particle
operators (e.g., the mean-field Hamiltonian) are classified according
to one-dimensional representations [6], and hence, from
the view-point of the symmetry breaking it is irrelevant whether or
not a given subgroup has spinor representations.
Apart from the phase relations of electromagnetic moments[6]
(note that the standard multipole operators are defined by singling out
the z axis), the three Cartesian directions are, of course, entirely
equivalent. Therefore, even though changing names of axes leads to
different subgroups of D
or D
,
they are identical from
the point of view of physically important features. In Tables
1 and 2, we give in the third columns the numbers of generic
subgroups, i.e., those which are different irrespective of
names of axes, and in the fourth column - the total numbers of
subgroups of each type. Index k always denotes one of the
axes, i.e., k can be equal to x, y, or z, while indices land m, l
m, denote one of the three pairs of different axes.
Subgroups in types ``0'' do not depend on the Cartesian axes and, therefore, for them the numbers of generic subgroups are equal to the total numbers of subgroups. Those in types ``I'' have one generic form each, and three forms in total, depending on which Cartesian axis is chosen. Finally, for subgroups in types ``III'', the total numbers of subgroups can be the same, three times larger, or six times larger (2-IIIA) than the numbers of generic subgroups.
In practical applications, conservation of different D
or D
subgroups may require considering either only the generic
subgroup, or all the subgroups with changed names of axes.
For example, if one considers a triaxially deformed system
with 0
60
,
the lengths of
principal axes ay
ax
az define the
orientation of the nucleus. Then, conserved D
or D
subgroups
with different names of axes may lead to different physical
consequences. On the other hand, it can be advantageous to
consider only one generic subgroup, with a fixed orientation,
and allow for various orientations of the physical system by
extending allowed values of
deformation
beyond the standard first sector
0
60
.