Following closely the methodology of introducing higher-order
derivatives of zero-range pseudopotentials [11], we obtain
the general form of the finite-range pseudopotential by coupling
derivative operators with spin operators in the spherical-tensor
formalism. The complete list of the building blocks of the tensors
can be found in Ref. [9]. We obtain the
finite-range version by simply substituting the zero-range Dirac
delta with a regularized (smeared) delta,
In such a formalism, the general expression for the antisymmetrized finite-range
pseudopotential reads,
For the sake of completeness, we recall here definitions of
tensors that appear in Eq. (3). Each term of the
pseudopotential is a scalar with a composite internal structure and is
built of higher-rank spherical tensors in the space, spin, and isospin
coordinates. Higher-order tensor derivatives
are built of
relative momenta
, with spherical
components
In the spin space, for particles numbered by 1 or 2, we have as building
blocks the spin unity matrix of rank 0, denoted as
, and
the Pauli matrices
, which
define the spin spherical tensor of rank 1,
The locality delta functions
together with the
regularized delta
must be understood as distributions, whereupon the
derivatives in
and
act. The locality deltas ensure the locality of the
energy density only in the zero-range case, whereas it
is in principle nonlocal due to the presence of the
so called Majorana operator
in the exchange part of the
pseudopotential.
In Eq. (3), index , taking either
value 0 or 1, defines the dependence of the pseudopotential on the isospin.
This dependence is in addition to that stemming from the
exchange term, and is a new element as compared to
the case of the zero-range pseudopotential [11].
In principle, one could write down an equivalent version of the
antisymmetrized
finite-range pseudopotential, where the new dependence on the isospin
exchange operator would have been substituted by the Majorana
operator exchanging space coordinates, . This would be
possible in virtue of the relation
, valid when acting on a
fermionic wave function. However, the presence
of the Majorana operator in the pseudopotential would break the
correspondence between the exchange part of the antisymmetrized
pseudopotential and the nonlocal sector of the EDF, according to the common
understanding of the nonlocal part of the EDF as resulting from the exchange
part of the antisymmetrized interaction. While in a zero-range pseudopotential
this operator reduces to a phase depending on the order of the relative-momenta
tensors [23,11], in a finite-range interaction this
operator acts explicitly, and switches the space coordinates of the
two interacting nucleons. Therefore the finite-range character of the
interaction, complemented with the action of the Majorana operator,
would have given rise to the nonlocal form of the functional stemming
from the direct interaction. Although such a construction would be
perfectly correct and exactly equivalent to that presented below, it
would also be counterintuitive, and thus in our study it is not further
pursued.
The constructed pseudopotential possesses all symmetries of the nuclear interaction. Referring the reader to Ref. [11] for a comprehensive discussion, here we only list these symmetries, which are rotational symmetry, time-reversal, parity, and Galilean invariance, supplemented with the hermiticity of the pseudopotential operator and indistinguishability principle operating as invariance under exchange of particles 1 and 2. The pseudopotential (2) is indeed invariant under all the transformations corresponding to the symmetries listed above. This guarantees that the resulting EDF is also invariant with respect to the same symmetries.
All terms of the pseudopotential, derived at zero, second, fourth,
and sixth order,
, 2, 4, and 6, respectively,
are collected in the supplemental material. The supplemental
material contains all detailed results of the present study. They
were derived by means of symbolic programing, and are presented
in readable format as well as in the form directly usable in
computer programming.
In Table 1 we
show numbers of different terms of pseudopotential
(2), where we also distinguish between central
(
), SO (
), and tensor
(
) terms, corresponding to different ranks in the
coupling of the relative momenta tensors
with the spin operator
. At each order, the
overall numbers of terms equal 4, 14, 30, and 52, giving the total
number of 100 terms up to N
LO. At each order, these numbers are
twice larger than the corresponding numbers for the zero-range
pseudopotential, which reflects the addition of the new quantum
number
.
We note, that here we classified tensor terms as those corresponding
to ; however, in the pseudopotential
(3) there also appear terms that have purely
space-tensor character, e.g., those for
and
. However, we know from the generalized
Cayley-Hamilton (GCH) theorem [24], that any scalar function of
two vectors
and
must have form of a function of three elementary scalars
,
, and
. Therefore, the
central term (
) can always be recoupled to the form
where terms with
do not appear. An explicit
construction of such a form is presented in the Cartesian coordinates
in Sec. 4.
Order | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Total | |
0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
2 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 14 | |
4 | 16 | 4 | 10 | 30 | |
6 | 24 | 8 | 20 | 52 | |
N![]() |
52 | 14 | 34 | 100 |
Jacek Dobaczewski 2014-12-07