Apart from rendering the pairing weak in the interior, the specific
functional dependence on
used in Eq. (14) is
not motivated by any compelling theoretical arguments or
calculations. In particular, values of power
were chosen
ad hoc to be either equal to 1 (based on simplicity), see,
e.g., Refs. [15,16], or equal to the power
of
the Skyrme-force density dependence in the p-h channel
[9,4].
![]() |
The dependence of results on
was studied
in Ref. [17] within the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (HFB)
approach. We considered
four values of
=1, 1/2, 1/3, and 1/6
that cover the range of values of
used typically for the
Skyrme forces.
For
we took the standard value of 0.16fm-3,
and the strength V0 of DDDI was adjusted according to the prescription
given in Ref. [9], i.e., so as to obtain in each case the value
of 1.245MeV for the average neutron gap in 120Sn.
The resulting pairing-strength factors (14) are shown in
Fig. 3 as functions of density
=
for the four values of the exponent
.
It is seen that for
0.04fm-3 the pairing-strength factor
is almost independent of the power
.
At low densities, however, the pairing interaction becomes strongly
dependent on
and very attractive
at
0. The pattern shown in Fig. 3
indicates that pairing forces characterized by small values
of
should give rise to pair fields
peaked at, or even beyond, the nuclear
surface (halo region) where the nucleonic density is low.
![]()
|
The main conclusion of Ref. [17] is that,
due to the self-consistent feedback between particle and pairing densities,
the size of the neutron halo
is indeed strongly influenced by pairing correlations; hence, by
the pairing parametrization assumed. Consequently, experimental
studies of neutron distributions in nuclei are
extremely important for determining the density
dependence of pairing interaction in nuclei. At the same time, the
strong low-density dependence of the pairing force, simulated by taking very
small values of
in DDDI, is unphysical.
The present experimental data
are consistent with about 1/2
1.
In this context, it is interesting to note that excellent
fits to the data were obtained in Refs. [13,14]
by taking
=2/3. However, at present there is no theoretical argument
why the density dependence should be
even taken in a form of the power law.
Moreover, the pairing interaction is most likely of an
intermediate character between the volume (12) and surface
forms (13). (See Refs. [7,19,20] for
recent analyses.) In particular, the force which is a fifty-fifty
mixture of both types,
Figure 4 illustrates the role of using different types of the pairing interaction to predict the two-neutron separation energies and neutron pairing gaps, respectively, in very neutron-rich isotones around N=82. The experimental values were calculated based on the interim 2001 evaluation of atomic masses [18].
Figure 4 nicely illustrates the effect of the so-called shell
quenching in heavy nuclei [23], i.e., the vanishing of the
effective distance between the neutron single-particle levels above
and below a magic neutron number when approaching the neutron drip
line. The difference between the two-neutron separation energies
above and below N=82 very well visualizes this effect. In fact, the
experimental data show an apparent opposite effect; however, this is
caused by the fact that the data are available only for Z50.
When approaching the magic proton number, the neutron magic gap is
slightly enhanced [24]. This effect is entirely absent in
calculations that do not include any effects of correlations and
deformations.
Nevertheless, for Z<50 the effect of the shell quenching is very
well visible in the calculations. Moreover, the magnitude of the
effect is very strongly influenced by the type of pairing force
used. For the volume pairing force (12), the effect is rather
weak and the magic gap N=82 is still visible even at the very drip
line. However, for the surface pairing force (13) the shell
gap goes to zero much earlier, and this tendency is accentuated for
pairing forces that are stronger at small densities (for smaller
powers of ).
For the neutron pairing gap (Fig. 4) the experimental data that exist
for Z50 do not indicate any definite change in the
neutron pairing intensity with varying proton numbers. However, the
surface pairing interactions (bottom panels) give a slow dependence
for Z
50 that is dramatically accelerated after crossing
the shell gap at Z=50. On the other hand, the volume and
intermediate-type
pairing forces predict a slow dependence all the way through
to very near the neutron drip line. It is clear that measurements
of only several nuclear masses for Z<50 will allow us to
strongly discriminate between the pairing interactions that
have different space and density dependencies.
![]() |