![]() |
All collective potentials shown in Fig. 4 have two-humped
shapes and similar widths. Only in the case of Rf
,
can one see an additional small third external barrier. The outer
barrier is systematically reduced with
. The differences between
open and solid symbols illustrate the effect of triaxiality on the
inner barriers. The strongest effect is predicted for the nucleus
, where the barrier is lowered by more than 3MeV
due to triaxiality. However, for lighter isotones with
,
the role of triaxiality is modest.
For completeness, it is interesting to look at the neutron
and proton
spectral pairing gaps calculated along the static fission paths
shown in Fig. 4. They are shown in Fig. 5. As
already mentioned, the ground-state neutron pairing gaps
are equal to 0 in all
the
=184 isotones, whereas the proton gaps
change from
1.3MeV in
Rf
) to less than 0.5MeV in
. In the sub-barrier regions of the fission paths
(shadowed regions in the plot), neutron and proton spectral pairing
gaps fluctuate around 1MeV.
The size of a fission barrier is a measure of stability
of the nucleus against spontaneous fission. The static fission barriers
shown in Fig. 4 suggest a
possible increase of the stability against spontaneous fission for
. This predicted increase of the stability
supports the results obtained in our previous
paper,[10] where the same nuclei were considered within the
SHF+BCS(G) framework, but with the pairing strengths of
Eq. (1) scaled to reproduce the pairing gaps of the
finite-range droplet model (FRDM).[24]