The behavior of the nucleus at high angular momenta is strongly affected by the single-particle (s.p.) structure, i.e., shell effects. Properties of the s.p. orbits around the Fermi level determine the deformability of the nucleus, the amount of angular momentum available in the lowest-energy configurations, the moment of inertia, and the Coriolis coupling. Consequently, nucleonic shells can be seen and probed through the measured properties of rapidly rotating nuclei.
The independent particle model is a first approximation to the nuclear motion. Here, the nucleons are assumed to move independently of each other in an average field generated by other nucleons. Each nucleon occupies a s.p. energy level, and levels with similar energies are bunched together into shells. The wave function of a given many-body configuration uniquely characterized by s.p. occupations is an antisymmetrized product of one-particle orbitals (the Slater determinant). In the next step, the residual interaction between particles needs to be considered. This is the essence of the configuration interaction method or the interacting shell model. For heavier nuclei, where the number of s.p. orbits becomes large, a customary approximation is to divide the configuration space into the (inert) core states and the (active) valence orbits and to perform configuration mixing in the valence subspace.
The basic idea behind the additivity principle for one-body operators is
rooted in the independent particle model. The principle states that the
average value of a one-body operator in a given many-body
configuration
,
, relative to the average value in the core
configuration
, is equal to the sum of effective
contributions of particle and hole states by which the
-th
configuration differs from that of the core. Such a property is
trivially valid in the independent particle model. However, the presence
of residual interactions and resulting configuration mixing could, in principle,
spoil the simple picture. In particular, in the interacting shell
model, the polarization effects due to additions of particles or holes
are significant and they give rise to strong modifications of the mean field.
So the essence of the additivity
principle lies in the fact that these polarizations are, to a large
extent, independent of one another and thus can by treated additively.
The additivity principle for strongly deformed nuclear systems was emerging
gradually in the 1990s. First, it was found in Ref. [1]
that effective (relative) angular momentum
alignments are additive to a good precision in the
superdeformed (SD) bands around Gd. However, the analysis was only
restricted to a few bands. Later, the statistical analysis of
Ref. [2] in
the
and 190 mass regions clearly demonstrated that the so-called
phenomenon of band twinning (or identical bands) is more likely to occur in
SD than in normal-deformed bands. It was shown that a necessary condition
for the occurrence of identical bands is the presence of the same number of high-
intruder orbitals (see also Ref. [3]). In addition, it was
concluded that the
configuration-mixing interactions such as pairing and the coupling to the low-lying
collective vibrational degrees of freedom act destructively on identical bands by
smearing out the individuality of each s.p. orbital. Such individuality
is an important ingredient for the
additivity principle:
it is expected that this principle works only in the systems with weak residual
interaction, in particular, pairing [2,4].
The principle of additivity at superdeformation was explicitly and
thoroughly formulated for the case of the quadrupole moments in
the non-relativistic study of quadrupole moments of SD bands in the
mass region in Ref. [5] within the
cranked Hartree-Fock (CHF) approach based on Skyrme forces. It was
shown that the charge quadrupole moments calculated with respect to the
doubly magic SD core of
Dy can be expressed very precisely in
terms of effective contributions from the individual hole and particle
orbitals, independently of the intrinsic configuration and of the
combination of proton and neutron numbers.
Following this work, it was shown that the principle of additivity of quadrupole moments works also in the framework of the microscopic+macroscopic method (in particular, the configuration-dependent cranked Nilsson+Strutinsky approach) [6,7]. However, contrary to self-consistent approaches, the effective s.p. quadrupole moments of the microscopic+macroscopic method are not uniquely defined due to the lack of self-consistency between the microscopic and macroscopic contributions.
The study of additivity of quadrupole moments and
effective alignments was also performed in the framework of the cranked
relativistic mean field (CRMF) approach, but it was restricted to a few
configurations in the vicinity of the doubly magic SD core of Dy
[8]. It was suggested in this work that the additivity
principle when
applied to the angular momentum operator (i.e., effective
alignments) does not work as well as for the quadrupole moment. In
addition, the effective alignments of high-
intruder orbitals seem to
be less additive than the effective alignments of non-intruder
orbitals. The latter can be attributed to a pronounced polarization of
the nucleus by high-
intruder orbitals at high spin.
![]() |
For quadrupole moments, the additivity principle was experimentally
confirmed in the 140-150 mass region of superdeformation. It
was shown that the quadrupole moments of the SD bands in
Sm
[9] and
Gd [10] could be well
explained in terms of the
Dy SD core and effective
s.p. quadrupole moments of valence (particle and hole)
orbits. All of these studies, together with the previous results for
moments of inertia [11,12] and effective alignments
[13,8], strongly suggest that the SD bands in
the
140-150 mass region are excellent examples of an almost
undisturbed s.p. motion. This is especially true at
rotational frequencies above
=0.5 MeV [12,8] where pairing
is expected to be of minor importance. (For other excellent examples
of an almost undisturbed s.p. motion at high spins, see
Refs. [14,15,16].)
In the mass 135(
=58-62) light rare-earth region,
large
=58 and
=72 shell gaps (see Fig. 1 and
Refs. [17,18]) lead to the existence of rotational
structures with characteristics typical of highly deformed and SD
bands. These bands were observed up to high and very high spins (see
Refs. [19,20] and references quoted therein). For
example, the yrast SD band in
Ce extends to
68
,
which represents one of the highest spin states ever observed in atomic
nuclei [19]. At such high spins, pairing is expected to
play a minor role [11,18,21], which is a necessary condition
for the additivity principle to hold. In this mass region, experimental
studies of the additivity principle were performed in Refs. [21,20]. Differential lifetime measurements, free
from common systematic errors, were performed for over 15 different
nuclei (various isotopes of Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, and Sm) at high spin within
a single experiment [21,20].
There are several notable differences between the 135 and
140-150 regions of superdeformation. In particular, the
rotational bands in the
135 region are calculated to correspond
to the local energy minima that are characterized by much larger
-softness than those in the
140-150 mass region
[17,18]. Thus, one of the main goals of the present
manuscript is to find the impact of the
-softness on the
additivity principle. The second goal is a detailed study of the
additivity principle not only for quadrupole moments but also for
angular momentum alignments. The present work is the first study where
the additivity of relative alignments has been tested within the CHF and
CRMF frameworks in a systematic way along with the additivity of
quadrupole moments. Some results of this study have been reported in
Refs. [21,20].
This paper is organized as follows. The principle of additivity, definitions of physical observables, the way of finding effective s.p. quantities, and details of theoretical calculations are discussed in Sec. 2. Analysis of the additivity principle for quadrupole moments and relative alignments, and the discussion of associated theoretical uncertainties are presented in Sec. 3. Finally, Sec. 4 contains the main conclusions of our work.
|
![]() |