![]() |
In Figs. 1-5 we show the s.p. energies in Ca as functions of five isoscalar coupling constants
(5). Results were obtained by varying one coupling constant
of the SLy5 functional and by keeping all the remaining ones at their
SLy5 values. Ranges of variation of the coupling constants were
chosen in a maximum possible way, i.e., up to the values where changes of
level ordering or levels becoming unbound precluded obtaining
meaningful solutions. Of course, physical values of these coupling constants
are fairly well fixed by adjustments to empirical data, so, in practice,
physically acceptable variations must not be so large. Therefore,
values of parameters
used in the regression analysis below, also
shown in Figs. 1-5, were quite small. Positive
s.p. energies are shown only to indicate in which regions of parameters the levels
become unbound - precise values of these s.p. energies are only loosely related to
positions of resonances.
In Figs. 1-5 one can clearly see that there is
only a rather small overall non-linearity of the s.p. energies as
functions of the coupling constants. With decreasing values of
coupling constants
and
, the
s.p. potentials become deeper and thus the values of s.p. energies
uniformly decrease (Figs. 1 and 2). There are only
very small differences in the dependencies induced by varying
coupling constants
and
.
Somewhat larger changes in relative positions of s.p. levels are
induced by varying coupling constant
(Fig. 3). Decreasing values of this coupling constant induce
deeper s.p. potentials and larger values of the effective mass.
Coupling constant
clearly influences the surface
properties of the s.p. potentials (Fig. 4) by changing
relative positions of the low-
and high-
levels. Finally, the
SO coupling constant
very linearly
changes the SO splitting of levels shown in Fig. 5.
Dependence of levels on the tensor coupling constant
is very weak in a spin-saturated nucleus
Ca, and,
therefore, it is not shown.