![]() |
Figure 7 displays differences between the pairing renormalization and regularization procedures for the Sn isotopes. Calculations are performed with both volume and mixed pairing interactions. For the two-neutron separation energies, the maximum difference between the renormalization and regularization schemes is about 100 (300)keV for the volume (mixed) pairing. In the neutron gap, the corresponding difference is about 50 (100)keV, and in nuclear radii (not displayed) it is practically negligible (about 0.01fm). The largest differences show up in pairing energies - about 1 (3) MeV for the volume (mixed) pairing; however, total energy differences are much smaller - about 400 (800)keV.
![]() |
Analyzing the total energies obtained in both methods,
Fig. 7(a), one can see that the pairing renormalization
procedure gives systematically more binding. The differences are
negligible for stable nuclei and nuclei near the proton
drip line. They increase in mid-shell nuclei near the two-neutron
drip line where the pairing effects are the largest, and then
decrease towards the closed-shell nucleus Sn located just at
the two-neutron drip line. In general, both procedures give more similar results
in the case of volume pairing than in the case
of mixed pairing.
Recently, the pairing regularization procedure has been analyzed in the context of relativistic mean-field approximation [23]. In order to simulate the finite range contribution to the nuclear matter pairing gap coming from the Gogny pairing force, it was necessary to introduce strong density dependence in the pairing strength of the contact interaction.
Using the regularization procedure and calculating the Sn chain with
both volume and newly constructed (surface) contact interaction, the
authors of Ref. [23] have found differences in pairing
energies of the order of 20MeV in the neutron-rich nuclei around
Sn. In our work, for the same nuclei, the differences in pairing energies
between volume and mixed pairing variants do not exceed 2.6MeV. This comparison shows that
the density-dependent contact interaction proposed in Ref. [23] is
questionable for finite nuclei, despite its agreement with
the finite-range Gogny pairing force in the infinite nuclear matter.