An illustration of the single-particle proton-spectra for the nucleus
Gd is shown in Fig. 2. The presence of the important
(
2 MeV) tetrahedral-deformed gaps deserves noticing. These gaps correspond
to tetrahedral 'magic' configurations or tetrahedral 'shell closures' at Z=56,
70, and 90/94. In the latter case a huge, about 3 MeV gap is crossed by a single
level but the calculated effects of this structure are large; the related
discussion will be presented elsewhere. Observe also the four-fold degenerate
levels marked as continuous lines. These are the ones corresponding to the
four-dimensional irreducible representations of the underlying double
tetrahedral point group
. Referring to the same diagram let us emphasize
that the spherical
gap is unstable: the corresponding gap
increases with the increasing tetrahedral deformation.
The latter point brings us to a comparison between the spherical and tetrahedral
'magic' numbers. The discussion of tetrahedral magicity is a bit more
complex as compared to the well known discussions of the spin-orbit splitting
and the so-called spherical magic numbers 8, 20, 28, 50, 82 and 126. Indeed, the
underlying physics arguments behind the spherical magicity are related to
the strong main -shell grouping of the single-particle levels together with
the intervention of the 'un-natural' parity, highest
[
]-orbitals. The presence of these highest-
(intruder)
orbitals within the natural parity shells is caused by the strong spin-orbit
interaction that is held responsible for such a strong intruder level repulsion
and the corresponding spherical gaps.
![]() |
The calculated tetrahedral symmetry minima on total potential energy surfaces
(discussed in the next Section) are a consequence of the spontaneous-symmetry
breaking mechanism as the result of which the spherical mean field looses its
stability in competition with the intrinsic-parity breaking deformations. The
consequences thereof for the single-particle spectra is illustrated for the case
of neutrons in Fig. 3, analogous to Fig. 2. It is worth
emphasizing that magic tetrahedral gaps correspond to the same closures as in
the case of protons; even the large gap structures at N=90/94 crossed by a
single level look nearly the same as in the case of Z=90/94 configuration. We
wish to note the presence of the gap whose size is comparable to the
other tetrahedral gaps in the Figure.