The static variant of our model is based on the double projection, on
isospin and angular momentum, of a single Slater determinant. In an
even-even nucleus, the Slater determinant representing the
ground-state is uniquely defined. In an odd-odd nucleus, the
conventional MF theory that gives Slater determinants separably for
neutrons and protons faces problems. First, there is no single Slater
determinant representing the state,
see [4,9]. In our approach, this obstacle is
removed by projecting from the so-called anti-aligned Slater
determinant. This configuration, by construction, has no net
alignment and manifestly breaks the isospin symmetry, being an almost
fifty-fifty mixture of the
and
states. In this way, the
needed
component can be recovered. The problem is, however,
that the anti-aligned states are not uniquely defined. In the general
case of a triaxial nucleus, there exist three linearly-dependent
Slater determinants, built of valence neutron and proton
single-particle states that carry angular momenta aligned along the X
(
), Y (
), or Z
(
) axes of the intrinsic frame of
reference or, respectively, along the long, intermediate, and short
axes of the core. In our calculations, no tilted-axis anti-aligned
solution was found so far.
In the static approach, the only way to cope with this ambiguity is
to calculate three independent -decay matrix elements and to
take the average of the resulting
values. Such a
solution is not only somewhat artificial, but also increases the
theoretical uncertainty of the calculated ISB corrections. This
deficiency motivated our development of the dynamic model, which
allowed for mixing states projected from the three reference states
for k=X, Y, and Z, with the mixing matrix
elements derived from the same Hamiltonian that was used to calculate
them. The dynamic model further evolved towards a full
no-core configuration-interaction (NCCI) model, in which we allow for
mixing states projected from different low-lying
(multi)particle-(multi)hole Slater determinants
.
This final variant has all features of the no core shell
model, with two-body effective interaction (including the Coulomb
force) and a basis-truncation scheme dictated by the self-consistent
deformed HF solutions. The computational scheme proceeds in four major steps:
The numerical stability of the method is affected by necessary
truncations of the model space, namely, numerically unstable
solutions are removed by truncating either the high-energy states
or the natural states corresponding to
small eigenvalues of the norm matrix, or by applying both truncations
simultaneously. Although such truncation procedure gives reliable
values of the energy, the results shown below must still be
considered as preliminary.
Jacek Dobaczewski 2014-12-06