W. Satula, J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, and M. Rafalski
Date: April 13, 2009
The isospin symmetry, introduced by Heisenberg [1] and Wigner [2], is largely preserved by strong interactions; a small violation of isospin on the hadronic level is due to the difference in the masses of the up and down quarks [3]. In atomic nuclei, the main source of isospin breaking is the electromagnetic interaction [4,5]. Since the isovector and isotensor parts of electromagnetic force are much weaker than the strong interaction between nucleons, many effects associated with isospin breaking in nuclei be can treated in a perturbative way. With this caveat, the formalism of isotopic spin is a very powerful concept in nuclear structure and reactions [6,7], where many spectacular examples of isospin symmetry can be found.
The main effect of Coulomb force in nuclei is to exert a long-range overall polarization effect on nuclear states whose detailed structure is dictated by the short-ranged strong force. The net effect of such a polarization is a result of two competing trends: the nuclear force is strongly attractive in the isoscalar neutron-proton channel, while the Coulomb force acts against this attraction by making neutron and proton states different. In order to explain this interplay, self-consistent feedback between strong and electromagnetic fields must be considered to best locate the point of the nuclear equilibrium.
An
excellent example of this interplay is the systematic behavior of nuclear binding
energies: with increasing mass number, the stability line bends away
from the =
line towards the neutron-rich nuclei. The effect of
electromagnetic force on nuclear binding is clearly non-perturbative.
Even in medium-mass nuclei, which
are of principal interest in this study, energy
balance between strong and Coulomb forces
is not tremendously favorable, e.g., 342MeV versus 72MeV in
Ca. The situation becomes dramatic in superheavy
nuclei and in the neutron star crust, where not only the binding but
also spectra are strongly impacted by the Coulomb frustration effects
resulting from a self-consistent, non-perturbative feedback between
strong and electromagnetic parts of the nuclear Hamiltonian
[8,9].
The strong motivator for studies of isospin breaking is nuclear beta decay. The new data in superallowed 0
0
nuclear beta decays [10], including a number of
high-precision Penning-trap measurements, require improved calculations
of isospin-breaking corrections [11,12]. As far as nuclear spectroscopy is concerned, there has been an increased interest in isospin-related phenomena in
recent years [7]. For instance, studies of excited states of
proton-rich nuclei with
resulted in significantly improved information on Coulomb energy
differences [13]. In some cases, observed Coulomb shifts
turned out to be surprisingly large [14],
thus fueling speculations of significant nuclear charge-symmetry-breaking forces.
A precise description of Coulomb effects in nuclei constitutes a
notoriously difficult computational challenge. In the shell-model
approach to the isospin mixing (see,
e.g., Refs. [15,16]), the effective shell-model
Hamiltonian including the Coulomb interaction is diagonalized in a
proton-neutron basis to account for non-perturbative effects. The
overall strength of the isospin-breaking interactions is usually
renormalized by reproducing the rms proton point radii obtained from
spherical Hartree-Fock (HF) calculations [16] or by fitting the
experimental isobaric mass shifts [15,17]. To take into account
the coupling to the giant monopole resonance that appreciably
influences the radial mismatch between the proton and neutron wave
functions [5], single-particle wave functions can be taken from HF
calculations. More precise treatments require determining the effective
Coulomb interaction in the large space, which is possible in the
no-core shell model. Such calculations have been carried out for
C [18] in the space allowing all 8
excitations relative to the unperturbed ground state. Currently, however,
ab-initio approaches to superallowed Fermi transitions do not go beyond
C which marks the state of the art.
In heavier nuclei, especially those involving many nucleons outside closed shells, the isospin mixing can be well described by the mean-field (MF) or energy-density-functional (EDF) methods [19], where the Coulomb force amounts to making the neutron and proton single-particle orbitals different, and the long-range polarization effects (e.g., those related to the isoscalar and isovector monopole resonance) are fully taken into account.
The fact that the MF
methods allow for precise treatment of long-range operators is, in fact,
essential for the physics of isospin mixing.
However, it was very early realized
[20,21,22,23,24] that these nice physical
properties of the MF methods are accompanied by unwanted spurious
effects related to the fact that the neutron and proton
single-particle states in nuclei are different even without
Coulomb interaction included. Indeed, the presence of the neutron or
proton excess automatically yields isovector mean fields, i.e., different HF potentials for
protons and neutrons. This unwelcome feature has hampered
MF calculations of the isospin mixing beyond the
systems (see,
e.g., Ref. [25]). To overcome this difficulty in the present study, we employ the
mean-field methods in the framework of Refs. [22,23],
which is entirely free of the spurious isospin mixing. Thereby, for
the first time, we determine the isospin mixing within the context of
modern EDF methods.
We begin by noting that the self-consistent MF state
can be expanded in good-isospin basis
:
To assess the true isospin mixing,
the total Hamiltonian (strong interaction plus the Coulomb interaction with the physical charge
) is rediagonalized in the
space spanned by the good-isospin wave functions:
Our self-consistent calculations have been carried out by using the SLy4 EDF parameterization [26] and the HF solver HFODD [27] that allows for arbitrary spatial deformations of intrinsic states. Both direct and exchange Coulomb terms are calculated exactly. We adopted the standard technique of isospin projection [28]. Details pertaining to our method can be found in Ref. [29], together with numerical tests.
![]() |
![]() |
The AR isospin mixing is rapidly quenched with
![]() |
The lower panel of Fig. 4 shows the total AR energy as a
function of
. Here, we can understand the role of
as a variational
parameter that can be used to optimize the good-isospin basis
. It is
gratifying to see that the minimum of energy is obtained almost
exactly at the physical value of
. Namely, the
optimal wave functions
are generated
by taking at the MF level the full Coulomb
interaction having the physical charge. However, it is to be noted that
the energy differences in Fig. 4 are
quite small, of the order of a few hundred keV. Moreover, as
discussed above, the isospin mixing is almost insensitive to such a
refinement of
. This result supports our initial assumption: the good-isospin states
are fairly robust to the variations of the isospin-breaking
interaction, i.e., they well capture
self-consistent polarization effects.
![]() |
Although our results give first reliable estimates of the isospin
mixing within extended MF theory, the final values of
are still quite uncertain, which is due to an imperfect determination of
the nuclear EDF.
This is illustrated in Fig. 5 which shows the isospin mixing calculated in BR and AR variants for a heavy
=
nucleus
Sn
for a wide selection of the Skyrme EDF parameterizations
[19]. We note that
does depend on the nuclear
effective interaction: the difference between extreme AR values obtained for
SkO and SkP is as large as 1.5%, which is
about 30% of the value of the isospin mixing in
Sn.
In trying to pin down
those features of the EDF that would be responsible for differences
in , we have attempted to find correlations between
isospin mixing and various EDF characteristics [19].
We conclude that no clear correlations exist between
and those EDF parameters that are related to nuclear-matter properties.
In particular, this is true for the nuclear-matter symmetry energy,
the prime suspect to influence the properties of the isovector channel.
We did find a very clear correlation of the BR values of
with the differences between the MF proton and neutron rms radii (see
Fig. 5).
This is not surprising, as the monopole polarization does impact the
proton and neutron radii, and their difference.
However, after the rediagonalization, the values of
show a much weaker correlation.
Clearly, the precise values of the isospin mixing parameter depend
on fine details of the nuclear EDF.
In conclusion, we performed the self-consistent analysis of isospin
mixing within the extended mean-field approach. Our method is
non-perturbative; it fully takes into account long-range polarization
effects associated with the Coulomb force and neutron excess. The
nuclear Hamiltonian, including the full Coulomb interaction, is
diagonalized in a good-isospin basis obtained by isospin projection from
self-consistent HF states. Not surprisingly, the largest
isospin-breaking effects have been predicted for =
nuclei, where
the effects due to the neutron (proton) excess are smallest and the
Coulomb force dominates the picture.
The unphysical isospin violation
caused by the neutron excess is significant on the MF level: the largest
effect is predicted in =2 nuclei. However, the
rediagonalization procedure eliminates the spurious isospin mixing almost
completely. While the optimal many-body solutions are obtained by using
the double variational approach, we have demonstrated that one obtains a
reasonable good-isospin basis by broadly varying the strength of the
Coulomb interaction of the EDF. Finally, we investigated the dependence of
isospin mixing on the self-consistent feedback between the nuclear
and Coulomb terms. We found an appreciable dependence of
on the parametrization of the nuclear functional and found a rough
correlation between the isospin mixing and the difference between proton
and neutron rms radii. The microscopic approach described in this study
will be applied to isospin symmetry-breaking corrections to superallowed
Fermi beta decays, Coulomb energy differences, and properties of
analogue states.
Discussions with Erich Ormand are gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported in part by the Polish Ministry of Science under Contract No. N N202 328234, Academy of Finland and University of Jyväskylä within the FIDIPRO programme, and U.S. Department of Energy under Contract Nos. DE-FG02-96ER40963 (University of Tennessee) and DE-AC05-00OR22725 with UT-Battelle, LLC (Oak Ridge National Laboratory).